Behrend Faculty Senate Meeting Minutes
October 7, 2024
- Room Change and Announcements
- Room Change Issue
- The meeting room was changed last minute due to a scheduling conflict with a current class.
- CollegeNet had approved the room, but it was occupied.
- Updates to Previous Meeting Minutes
- Jodie Styers’s title was incorrect.
- The name of the School of Engineering director position was incorrect.
- These errors will be corrected in the minutes.
- Approval of Minutes
- Motion to approve the minutes was made by David Dieteman.
- Motion was seconded by Jay Amicangelo.
- Room Change Issue
- Annual Salary Increases Discussion
- H.R. 43 Policy Overview
- H.R. 43 outlines the eligibility criteria for annual salary increases.
- Increases are based on merit, including research, service, and teaching load.
- Employees who did not complete the annual training of Values, Ethics, and Compliance by the University-established deadline are excluded.
- Policy Effective Date and Transparency Issues
- The current version of the policy is effective August 6, 2024.
- Unlike other University policies, changes and updates to H.R. 43 are not transparent.
- There is no access to previous versions or records of changes.
- Clarifications and Historical Context
- Kim confirmed that the stipulation regarding training has always been part of the policy.
- The only recent change (E624 version) was the inclusion of language around individuals who had left.
- The original date of the policy is not visible on the current document.
- H.R. 43 Policy Overview
- Compliance Training Policy and Salary Increases
- Policy Origin: The compliance training policy was established in 1962.
- Training Implementation: Compliance training has been mandatory since after 2011.
- Salary Forfeiture: Individuals have not received salary increases if they failed to complete the training by the deadline.
- Annual Deadlines and Communication
- Deadline Setting: Deadlines are set annually by the University, causing inconsistencies.
- Email Communication:
- 2022: Initial email did not mention the connection between training and ASI. Training was due April 22nd.
- 2023: Initial email on March 28th did not mention the connection, but a reminder on May 1st did. Deadline was extended to June 23rd.
- 2024: Initial email in March, deadline moved up to May 3rd. Final reminder sent by Lauren Hendershaw on May 3rd.
- Issues and Concerns
- Inconsistent Messaging: The language in emails has been inconsistent, causing confusion.
- Faculty and Staff Impact:
- Non-Compliance Consequences: Approximately 200+ faculty and staff did not receive raises, with about 20% from Behrend.
- Confusion Over Deadlines: Faculty and staff were blindsided by the lack of raises due to missed deadlines.
- Supervisor Communication: Supervisors were expected to remind staff, but this was inconsistently done.
- Specific Yearly Details
- 2022:
- Training due April 22nd.
- No explicit connection to ASI in initial email.
- 2023:
- Initial email on March 28th, reminder on May 1st.
- Deadline extended to June 23rd.
- 2024:
- Initial email in March, deadline May 3rd.
- Final reminder by Lauren Hendershot on May 3rd.
- 2022:
- Faculty Senate Discussion
- Impact on Morale: The handling of the policy has negatively impacted faculty morale.
- Financial Consequences: Missing the training deadline affects raises and future salary increases, impacting retirement contributions.
- Equity Concerns: The penalty for missing the training deadline is seen as excessive and inequitable.
- Recommendations for Improvement
- Consistent Deadlines: Establish a consistent deadline every year.
- Clear Communication: Ensure emails explicitly state the connection between training completion and salary increases.
- System Changes: LRN system should prevent completion after the deadline to avoid confusion.
- Policy and Data Usage
- Training Data Validity
- Policy Understanding: Emphasis on the importance of policy adherence.
- Data Collection: Any data collected after the specified deadline should not be used.
- Example: Training completed after the deadline is not valid for the next year.
- New Campaign Launch: A new campaign will be launched in January.
- Consistency in Dates:
- Recommendation for a consistent date every year (e.g., May 1st).
- Avoid scheduling during finals week.
- Equity and Accessibility
- Neurodivergent Faculty and Staff:
- Communication issues related to neurodivergent individuals (e.g., ADHD, autism).
- Emails did not follow suggested accommodations for neurodivergent individuals.
- Accessibility Resources:
- Mention of Penn State accessibility website for learning disorders and accommodations.
- Different communication for those with documented disabilities through the appropriate office.
- Action: Process for accommodations will be shared.
- Neurodivergent Faculty and Staff:
- Training Data Validity
- Policy Penalties and Compliance
- Harsh Penalties
- Discussion on Penalties:
- Concerns about the harshness of penalties for non-compliance.
- Historical consistency in penalties over the years.
- University Oversight:
- Compliance training is mandated due to University oversight.
- Impact on faculty and staff morale.
- Discussion on Penalties:
- Faculty Senate Involvement
- Faculty Senate Role:
- Suggestion to work through Faculty Senate to address concerns.
- Decision to reverse penalties would come from the highest levels of the University, not HR.
- Faculty Senate Role:
- Harsh Penalties
- Administration and Faculty Morale
- Administration's Perspective
- Value of Employees:
- Administration values faculty and staff and aims to ensure they feel valued.
- Importance of raises and positive morale.
- Visibility and Communication:
- Efforts to make Behrend visible within the University community.
- Highlighting achievements and contributions to the region.
- Value of Employees:
- Faculty Concerns
- Morale and Appreciation:
- Concerns about the impact of policies on faculty morale.
- Specific mention of part-time faculty and the need for competitive compensation.
- Suggestion to provide additional benefits (e.g., parking).
- Morale and Appreciation:
- Administration's Perspective
- Faculty Senate Motion
- Motion to Address Concerns
- Letter to University Senate:
- Motion to send a letter from Behrend Faculty Senate to University Senate.
- Expressing concerns and providing suggestions for future improvements.
- Collaboration:
- Collaboration between faculty members to draft the letter.
- Sharing notes and specific concerns to be included in the letter.
- Letter to University Senate:
- Motion to Address Concerns
- Updates and Announcements
- Enrollment and Events
- Enrollment Data:
- Official enrollment numbers for Behrend: 3368 residential students, 1018 World Campus students, total 4386.
- Positive growth in residential students.
- Upcoming Events:
- Admissions open house October 12.
- Today is Gardens' dedication.
- Enrollment Data:
- University Senate Updates
- Policy Revisions:
- Removal of SRTE requirements for classes with 7 or fewer credits.
- Senate Membership:
- Discussion on the appropriate size and representation model for the Senate.
- Accelerated Programs:
- Committee working on accelerated programs, willing to present to the Senate.
- Policy Revisions:
- Motion to adjourn: Melanie Ford, seconded by Matt Swinarski
- Enrollment and Events
- Action Items
[ ] Send out the updated meeting minutes after the meeting.
[ ] Check the original date of the H.R. 43 policy on the document.
[ ] Advocate for a consistent annual deadline for compliance training.
[ ] Ensure email communications explicitly state the connection between training completion and salary increases.
[ ] Propose system changes to prevent training completion after the deadline.
[ ] Share the process for accommodations for neurodivergent individuals.
[ ] Draft and send a letter from Behrend Faculty Senate to University Senate expressing concerns and suggestions.
[ ] Share enrollment data and positive news stories with the campus community.
[ ] Encourage attendance for the "Thinking Creatively in the Classroom" workshop.